The campaign was produced and ran nationally across TV and digital in 2023. A post-campaign brand-lift study (Ad.Look methodology, Millward Brown — preliminary topline, 20″ film, n=150 women 25–35) measured the work against category norms. The figures below are the study's preliminary topline; the research house flags them as provisional pending the full analytical report.
The strongest indicator was brand linkage — viewers connected the film to O'Stin specifically, not generically to a discount, which is the single most important number for an image-led execution. Branded ad recall and purchase motivation also tracked at or above norm, suggesting the work did not trade commercial pull for image work — it carried both. The research house's own verdict described the result as solid, driven by confident brand linkage.
67Brand linkage — at/above norm
61Branded ad recall — at/above norm
66Purchase motivation (adj.) — at/above norm
62Likeability — at/above norm
Not every metric tracked above norm, and it is worth reading those honestly. Distinctiveness, salience and category-fit scores landed below norm. The honest interpretation is that a single 20-second image film built around a cultural code deliberately does not push “the brand meets your wardrobe needs” — it trades category-claim for perception shift, and that is the exchange the strategy proposed. Re-coding a mass-market retailer's distinctiveness in the eyes of a sceptical audience is a multi-touch, multi-season job. One film opens that work; it does not close it.
23Distinctiveness — below norm
19Salience — below norm
19“Meets category needs” — below norm
21“Sets the tone in the market” — below norm